Crime Prevention: Background
Crime prevention has always been at the core of law
enforcement since Sir Robert Peel organized London's first police force
and published Principles of Policing:
1. The basic mission for which the police exist
is to prevent crime and disorder.
9. The test of police efficiency is the absence
of crime and disorder, not the visible evidence of police action in
dealing with it.
The most recognized definition of crime prevention
comes from the National Crime Prevention Institute:
The anticipation, recognition and appraisal of a
crime risk and the initiation of some action to remove or reduce it.
Although there is general agreement that the purpose
of crime prevention is to improve the quality of life through the
reduction of crime, individuals involved in law enforcement and crime
prevention have diverse views on mechanisms that can reduce crime. This
web site will focus on crime prevention through environmental design
(CPTED) and other strategies associated with the "broken
windows" hypothesis. [click on
When Good Spaces Go Bad for additional
information on the broken windows hypothesis]
To help illustrate how CPTED works consider the three
elements required for criminal activity: desire, ability and
opportunity. If just one of these elements can be removed the possibility of a crime being
committed can be dramatically reduced. Which of these elements is the
easiest to remove?
- Desire would be very difficult to remove since it
involves complex factors like hunger, poverty, drug addiction and thrill seeking
teenagers. It's simply not possible to immunize people against criminal
intent.
- Ability involves everyday tools like
screwdrivers and hammers as well as the skills and knowledge about
using them. As a college instructor, I'm continually amazed at
transfer of knowledge that occurs among inmates in prison
populations. Sadly, the information they are conveying is often
involves learning the ability to perform criminal activity. So, like
desire, removing the ability of someone to commit a crime is also
not feasible. Besides... if you outlaw screwdrivers, only outlaws
will have screwdrivers! (Sorry, I couldn't resist ;-)
- Opportunity is the easiest element to remove.
Successful examples of how the opportunity element has
been knocked out of the equation include the introduction of direct deposits and
the requirement of exact fare for
bus rides.
- The U.S. Treasury Department and American
Association of Retired Persons worked together to successfully
introduce "direct deposit" to reduce mail theft of retirement
checks. These organizations have not only saved money due to fewer
police calls and mail theft investigations, the recipients have
benefited from less downtime associated with cashing checks.
- After bus transpiration companies implemented a
strict exact fare policy, robberies and assaults to bus drivers were
dramatically reduced. Unfortunately, the rates of murders, robberies, and assaults
of cab drivers are still incredibly high. Why? Because taxi cab
drivers carry cash to make change. Perhaps this is why taxi cab
drivers experience the highest workplace murder rate.
Criminals are more than ready to exploit new
opportunities that appear in society. Due to the ease of obtaining and
using credit cards many new opportunities exist and have resulted in a
high crime rate associated with credit card fraud. Some of these new
opportunities include the seemingly daily arrival of streamlined credit
card applications in the mail, the fact that 23% of the population
carries 3 or 4 credit cards, and more people are writing their
personal identification numbers on their bank debit cards.
What is CPTED?
CPTED is the acronym for "Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design."
The following definition comes from a training manual on CPTED produced by the Virginia Crime Prevention Association
(VCPA). :
The proper design and effective use of the built
environment can lead to a reduction in the incidence and fear of crime
and an improvement in the quality of life.
or, more to the point:
Less crime by design.
Why CPTED? Why Trees?
While criminologists continue to research the causes of crime, it's
important to recognize variables that may work for, or against, crime
prevention. Trees growing in urban areas are one of those variables. When trees are
carefully selected and maintained they can provide many economical,
ecological and societal benefits to a community. Balancing the benefits
trees provide against potential conflicts with crime prevention is the
focus of this web site and my research.
Even though our knowledge of the causes of crime
is incomplete, we do know a few things about human behavior. The
environment does influence our behavior. It stands to reason that the
environment also influences criminal behavior. If a crime prevention
strategy is going to be successful it must incorporate environmental
design in its core components. It is also important that the crime
prevention strategy be inexpensive.
Goals of CPTED
Note
how the above definition includes recognition that a reduction in the
incidence and fear of crime are equally important outcomes of CPTED.
It is particularly important that people perceive a space as being safe.
Once people occupy a space they will be more likely to defend their
space. Security recommendations made for an area
without taking into account the purpose of
that specific area often result in target
hardening.
Good for Business and Limiting Liability
If there were a way that a business could improve security with a
relatively small investment they would probably be very interested? Before installing
security cameras, hiring security guards, and other costly measures
businesses should make sure they have maximized natural crime prevention
measures (CPTED). Incorporating CPTED in the early planning phases is
the most cost effective approach.
The courts are already aware of classic crime prevention approaches
(security guards, CCTV, etc) and will hold property owners accountable
when such measures have not been installed when recommended or have been
poorly implemented. It's only a matter of time before courts will become aware of "natural"
crime prevention approaches (like CPTED) and hold businesses, site
managers, and property owners to the same level of accountability as
more traditional crime prevention strategies.
Three Components of CPTED
The following definitions come directly from a
pamphlet published by the Virginia CPTED Committee (CPTED Tips To
Enhance Security).
Natural Surveillance - increases visibility
Seeing and being seen are important aspects of crime prevention.
Natural surveillance guides the placement of physical features such as
windows, lighting and landscaping which affect how much can be seen. A
potential criminal is less likely to attempt a crime if he or she is at
risk of being observed. At the same time, we are likely to feel safer
when we can see and be seen.
Natural Access Control - restricts access
Natural access control guides people entering and leaving a space
through the placement of entrances, exits, fences, landscaping and
lighting. Access control can decrease opportunities for criminal
activity by denying criminals access to potential targets and creating a
perception of risk for would-be offenders.
Territoriality - promotes a sense of ownership
Physical design can create a sphere of territorial influence that can
be perceived by, and may deter, potential offenders. Defined property
lines and clear distinctions between private and public spaces are
examples of the application of territorial reinforcement. Territorial
reinforcement can be created using landscaping, pavement designs,
decorative gateways, signs, and fences.
It is possible to consider these three components conceptually
distinct, but in practice there is a considerable amount of overlap.
Generally, natural access control and natural surveillance fall under
the umbrella concept of territoriality (Crowe, 2000).
A Fourth Component?
The National Crime Prevention Council recognizes an additional component
- Activity Support. This component recognizes the importance of
encouraging legitimate activity in public spaces. Constructing a pool in
a public park can provide recreation for youth and increase natural
surveillance as well as territoriality. Other examples of activity
support include Neighborhood Watch groups, block parties, parades, and
neighborhood clean-up days.
Limitations of CPTED
CPTED strategies are most successful when they inconvenience the public
the least.
Battling Convenience
Many individuals increase their chances of becoming
victims in the name of convenience. One example of this occurs when
someone writes their personal identification
numbers on their bank debit cards.
Sorry... no checklist
CPTED is a process - NOT a checklist. Due to the large number of
variables associated with CPTED, it is best approached as a process and
not simplified into a checklist. Cost of
Prevention
Following a formal safety assessment by a qualified law enforcement
representative, a list of recommended security
modifications will be left with the property owner. Many of these
recommendations will be expensive. For example, there will probably be a recommendation
to install high quality security locks on all outside doors to improve
access control. It is also very likely that security lighting will be
recommended to improve natural surveillance at night. The cost of these
recommendations can add up quickly to confront the property owner with a
major obstacle preventing him from taking immediate steps to improve the
security around his property. Because of this, the individual performing
the safety assessment will want to be sure to include some
recommendations for some basic landscape modifications like pruning. In
addition to being inexpensive, the act of "doing something"
allows the property owner to take immediate action and begin to participate
in the CPTED process. Conducting
A Community Safety Assessment
An assessment team is assembled from a variety
of members in the community based upon their ability to provide
information on preventing crime in the community. The assessment team should only be consist of about
four or five individuals so the team can work effectively. A typical assessment team
may consist of:
- Police officer or CPTED representative (often times
the leader)
- Community
police officer that can provide the history of the community
- Building inspector
- Fire
Marshall
- Traffic
engineer
- Community
leader
- Planner
- Housing
manager
- Social
service board
- Health
department
- Educator
-
Horticulturist/Consulting Arborist
- This is the one individual often missing from
assessment team. Part of the reason for developing this web site
is to encourage others to include arborists and horticulturists as
contributing members to crime prevention initiatives, especially when
the urban environment is a concern.
How Will You Know If Crime Prevention Is
Working?
How will you know if CPTED, or crime
prevention in general, is working? Here are some useful indicators:
- the
stability of a neighborhood
- the
quality of life for the residents
- residents
taking better care of their properties
- resident
have control over the space
- parents
supervising children
- vehicular
traffic obeys traffic
- residents
have good relationship with law enforcement
- active
neighborhood watch program
- increase
in assessed valuation of real estate
- decrease
in property crime (property crime?)
- no
visible signs of drug or gang activity
- decrease,
or absence, or vandalism and graffiti
- increase
in building permits
- increase
in owner occupancy
- whether
people feel safer
- appears
to be kept up
- less
trash
- less
weeds and invasive species
A theme that will be explored throughout this website is the
shared history and values
between CPTED and urban forests (urban landscapes). For example, the above list could
appear in CPTED literature as well as in landscaping literature.
Brown, J. 2002. Virginia Crime Prevention Association.
Richmond, VA. Personal Communication, May 2002.
Crowe, T. 2000. Crime Prevention Through
Environmental Design: Applications of Architectural Design and Space
Management Concepts. Second Edition. National Crime Prevention
Institute. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann
Harris, P. 2002. Virginia Crime Prevention Association.
Richmond, VA. Personal Communication, May 2002.
The Virginia Crime Prevention Association and the National Crime Prevention Council's web site, and
other state and national crime prevention organizations, can be found on
the links page.
|