Background: When Good Spaces Go Bad
Trees & Crime

If you don't consciously design-out crime, then most likely you will design-in crime. 


occasio facit furem
(opportunity makes a thief)


Broken Windows (Wilson and Keeling (1982) article) from The Atlantic Monthly


 

 


Crime.
  • Innocent Question: If "crime" is a problem, can't we just identify what causes crime and then neutralize these causes?
  • Sad Reality: Unfortunately, we don't know what causes crime, but we sure have a lot of ideas about how to stop it!
    • Criminologists have yet to determine causes for crime and delinquency. This means that philosophy is driving crime prevention. To further confuse matters, different groups propose their own cherished causes and remedies which further advance their social agendas.

Spaces
Communities are an assemblage of  “spaces.” The size, diversity, and location of the community influences the number of different kinds of spaces present. These spaces exist whether they have been planned or unplanned. When these spaces have been designed, the intention is that they will be occupied and utilized by law abiding citizens. It's important that each space has a purpose and is designed and maintained to support the intended purpose. Should a space be perceived as being dangerous then the people for whom the space was designed may avoid the space as they become increasingly concerned for their personal safety. Nature hates a vacuum. These abandoned spaces will soon be occupied by people for whom the space was not intended. The space now becomes not only a blight upon the community but a source of fear for law abiding citizens and this places a burden on the local law enforcement agency.

Broken Windows
Wilson
and Keeling (1982) used the image of a building with broken windows to illustrate how neighborhoods spiral into disorder and eventually crime if no one corrects the situation (fixes the broken windows).  It was Wilson that came up with the broken windows metaphor (Kelling & Coles, 1996).  If not repaired, the first broken  window will serve as a sign that no one cares or that no one is in charge.   

In addition to an actual broken window, there are other signs in urban areas that order is not being maintained. For example, an aggressive panhandler is a “broken window.” Failure to deal with the aggressive panhandler can lead to disorder when citizens begin to avoid the areas in front of stores where panhandlers operate. When there is lack of enforcement of existing laws concerning panhandling, other panhandlers relocate to the city to beg for money. Stores and businesses will not want to move to certain areas in the city where aggressive panhandling is allowed to occur and soon the entire business district suffers. [Please note that a return to the old days of street sweeping laws to control undesirables is not recommended and may not even be constitutional.] There are many signs in a community that serve as broken windows, including the vegetation that makes up the urban landscape (urban forest). A large dead tree, an unkempt lawn, even the presence of invasive species signal the presence of disorder on a property.   

Defining Disorder
 


 Background image from VA Crime Prevention Association

Disorder is a sign, physical and/or behavioral, that criminal activity may occur. Kelling and Coles (1996) use the term “disorder” to describe the event which occurs prior to public fear, urban decay and eventually crime. Disorder for a neighborhood is a relative term that describes the deviation from a sense of order (norm) recognized by the residents. Residents that are familiar with the behavior of “regulars” in the area have a different threshold for disorder than someone driving through the neighborhood. Even police officers have to recognize that two similar acts can be interpreted differently depending upon the individuals committing the acts. Police will respond differently to citizens congregating in a park to observe a late night meteoroid shower than they would to a band of homeless individuals passing through the city wishing to spend the night in the same park. Both groups are violating the law but only the homeless individuals signal disorder and consequently the fear of crime for area residents.

Disorder

  • Demoralizes communities
  • Undermines commerce
  • Leads to the abandonment of public spaces
  • Undermines public confidence in the ability of government to solve problems  

The Importance of Maintaining Order
Recognizing that disorder is not the same for all neighborhoods, it is possible that inexperienced law enforcement officers my not recognize disorder for a particular neighborhood until it has escalated into a more dangerous situation for the residents. Long ago, police foot patrols helped to decrease the fear of crime because their presence and ability to recognize disorder in the different neighborhoods on their patrol. Naturally, measures to reverse this series of events would involve “restoring order.”  

When Good Spaces Go Bad
The following illustrates how many people focus on the treatment of the symptoms and fail to recognize the root of the problem. Recently, on a popular urban forestry on-line discussion board, a string of comments and proposed solutions were made to a problem posted by an urban forester concerning the congregation of "undesirables" under the shade of a large tree on a street corner in his community. The presence of these individuals had completely intimidated law abiding citizens from using this particular intersection. The unintended users  in this area became increasingly bold and routinely conducted drug transactions during the day. The on-line postings quickly moved to removal of the large shade tree at the corner as a means of discouraging the presence of the undesirables. This was followed by a wave of postings arguing for the preservation of the tree for the benefit of the community since the undesirables may just move to the next shady street corner. The point that should have been discussed was the original purpose of that particular space and why it was no longer being utilized for that purpose - not debating how "shade" will influence the behavior of drug dealers.


Greenspace (day)


Greenspace (night)


The center bench was claimed by the leader ("Kevin").

Sleepless In Seattle
Spaces may be completely transformed, as in the above example, or they can be transformed for shorter periods of time. The loss of the intended purpose of a space can be a temporal event. Many urban playgrounds and parks are "controlled" by law abiding citizens during the day, especially in the morning and afternoon when children are traveling to and from school, however, at night these same spaces may be controlled by drug dealers.

I observed this temporal transformation in the purpose of a space at a green space located around a large commercial building in Seattle, Washington. During the day, the green space was utilized by employees as intended - primarily for lunch and smoking breaks. In the evening, after the employees left, homeless individuals moved into these empty green spaces. Security personnel told me the homeless individuals provided some degree of order to the area in that more dangerous individuals (drug dealers, gang members, etc) were being actively repelled from these green spaces by the homeless population. Even though it was temporary (dusk to dawn), this space was being defended by the homeless and a certain degree of order was in place. Within the homeless population there was a “pecking order” in which one individual claimed the best sleeping location and maintained order among the other homeless individuals.  Perhaps the security provided by the homeless population was superior to the professional security service which consisted of 1 to 2 individuals on duty making periodic security sweeps and very limited surveillance (security cameras operating in the dim light provided by landscape lighting around entrances and exits).    

What Role Can Landscapes Play In Restoring Order?
At first it would seem that the role of landscapes in maintaining order would be minimal. But, since disorder  and the fear or crime precedes crime, landscapes can be particular useful since properly designed and maintained landscapes improve property value, demonstrate that the property owner cares and can positively influence the perception of the public. Compared to other crime prevention approaches, landscaping is inexpensive and simple. Perhaps the best reason to promote the use of landscaping in crime prevention is that it provides an opportunity for citizens to actively participate in crime prevention.  Few crime prevention approaches are successful without the involvement of citizens. Landscaping may be the vehicle to help reintroduce citizens to that most important civic duty – looking out for their own safety and personal property.

Landscapes can help people define their space. Proper tree selection is critical in making areas more comfortable and thus, more likely to be occupied (Plant Selection and Design Suggestions).  Taking an active role in creating and maintaining a space is especially important for renters. This will help combat the feeling of “it’s not mine” (see territoriality) by allowing them to take ownership of their space through landscaping. 

What Role Can Landscapes Play In Preventing Dangerous Crime?

The six percenters represent the most criminally active youth in that individuals making up 6 percent of arrested youths commit 50 percent of all the serious crimes.

What can landscaping do to help deter the most serious criminals the six percenters? By landscaping to increase natural surveillance, access control and establish territoriality the “wannabes” will be discouraged and the six percenters will move on to an easier target. Much more complex societal issues need to be addressed (severe poverty, availability of hand guns, etc) to make a significant impact on this specific population of criminals.

Causation: A Lesson From Evolutionary Biology
Researchers in complex areas like evolutionary biology know that two different, and correct, answers can be obtained for one question. It’s important to know if the question is searching for the ultimate or proximate answer. Here's how I define these two terms to my general biology students:

  • Ultimate Causation - questions about why an animal has a particular behavior… or the reason why that behavior exists. In another sense, what we really want to know is why would natural selection favor such a behavior.
  • Proximate Causation - is concerned with how that behavior is carried out… or the underlying mechanisms for a particular behavior. For example, seeking to determine an environmental cue and what it triggers in the animal's nervous, muscular and/or endocrine systems to bring about that particular behavior.

Here’s one (admittedly weak) example of how one question can result in two answers – one answering the proximate question and the other answering the ultimate question. Why will a row of flowers along a street or sidewalk serve as symbolic barrier to deter someone from improperly accessing a property?

  • Proximate answer: People are trying to get from one point to another. Walking across a lawn or on street/sidewalk will help them achieve that goal. The flower bed was not part of the equation so their eyes naturally follow along the line of the street or sidewalk to a visible entrance.
  • Ultimate answer: The pedestrians consider the fact that someone went to the effort to plant those flowers. The flowers look nice. Nobody wants to be the first, and possibly only, shmuck to ruin this flower bed. Respecting the territory of others may be rewarded when they do the same for you.

 

References

Hershkoff, H. 1993. Aggressive Panhandling Law: Do These Laws Violate the Constitution? Yes: Silencing the Homeless. ABA Journal, vol. 79 (June 1993):40

Kelling, G.L. & C.M. Coles. 1996. Fixing Broken Windows: Restoring Order And Reducing Crime In Our Communities. New York : The Free Press.

Wilson, J.Q. & G.L. Keeling. 1982. Broken Windows. The Atlantic Monthly Vol. 249, No. 3, pp. 29-38.