HOME | SITE INDEX A - Z  |  SEARCH

Jim Wright

 

 

 

HOME

Fit-Tips

Video Tips

Student Weekly Fit Tips

Intramurals

The Fitness Center

Blue Ridge Christian Fellowship

Upcoming Health, Fitness, and Athletic Events

Biking

Health & Fitness News

 

 

Fit Tips!
 
Index: Click on the attachment below for an index, alphabetical by topic, which will help you scroll quickly through the articles below (in reverse chronological order, most recent), to find a particular article or an article addressing a particular subject. The list is not perfect or guaranteed complete as I started it well after authoring the articles, but you may find it quite helpful!

Fit-Tip Topical Index

6-5-08

It's Hot Outside: Drink!...Water!

Summer lovers and fitness friends and I hope all are both...!
 
Somehow this topic just "hit me"...in the form of a bright sunny 90 plus degree bike ride to campus..
 
I'd visited the hydration topic before but can't overemphasize: if you are exercising in the heat, the absolutely worse thing you can do is allow your body to become relatively dehydrated. And it's easy to do: just wait to drink until you are thirsty..
 
Even a very small negative water balance will affect your performance, and your mental state, and a major one will threaten your life. In point of fact, reviews of deaths in hot weather endurance events trace the cause invariably to dehydration, which robs your body of its ability to dissipate heat and thus maintain safe core temperature, through homodynamics (as your blood volume goes down) and sweating.
 
That said, what to drink? WATER!  H20!  Gatoraide and other sugar/electrolyte replacements are not poison but are seriously oversold: If you are exercising less than an hour at a time there is scant evidence they have any advantage over plain water, if under 30 minutes there is none. Your body has plenty of stored and blood glucose to carry you that long or longer, the extra calories might be one reason you are exercising in the first place, and the electrolyte imbalance leading to cramping is nearly always the result of a negative fluid...WATER...balance.  If anything, just incorporate enough potassium in your daily diet; a banana in the morning won't hurt..
 
Now if you are doing a 10 mile run or marathon, well, that's a "horse of another color".  (And probably lighter on his feet and maybe his brain as well....!....)
 
My blessings for a fun, active, safe summer!

 

5-22-08

 Lose that remote or lose your mind! (Inactivity and mental disorders)

 

This shouldn’t surprise you…. much.  But hopefully it’ll get your attention:

 

Numerous studies have correlated sedentary behavior with a higher prevalence of mental disorders, from relatively moderate stress and anxiety to the real “killers” of depression and bipolar disorder.  But correlation studies always leave open the question of which causes which, or does some third item cause both.  (Maybe people don’t exercise because they are a bit off somewhere in the head..?   [I could go somewhere else with that but will stifle myself, for now]…)  However a recently published longitudinal study, which followed over 10,000 participants for over six years, leaves little doubt.

 

Subjects with a physical activity above the group median had a relative risk of developing a mental disorder of 25% less than the sedentary individuals.  And those who spent over 42 hours per week in front of a TV or computer had a 30% higher mental disorder rate than those spending less than 10 hours staring at the screens.  (The researchers attributed this to its negative impact on physical activity; I personally suspect that the nature of much of the garbage on TV and obtainable from internet contributes to mental problems as well…)

 

An interesting “peripheral” finding of the study: Participants with the highest activity levels had the highest total energy intake (they ate the most food!), and the highest alcohol intake.  Though I wouldn’t recommend a high alcohol intake for health conscious folks of any physical activity level, both the higher food and drink levels undoubtedly reflects the fact that the highly active are able to “afford” (and may actually need) the extra calories, while a large number of sedentary…and therefore overweight…individuals are chronically cutting calories..

 

At any rate, this “message to take home” is, of course, worry more about what you do, physically, than how much you eat, and you’ll have less stress, anxiety, and other mental problems to worry about! 

 

Now put down the remote and/or mouse and go outside and play!!

 

My blessings for a physically active, mentally stable summer!

 

(and by the way, although my schedule does vary a good bit in the summer, due to, amazingly to me, popular demand, I will try to get off an occasional Fit Tip through the summer months…so stay tuned!!”)

 

5-12-08

Enough is enough! (Fast foods and portion sizes)

Our national obesity epidemic is undeniable, along with the consequences. Two thirds of us Americans overweight, half that number officially "obese". (Technically, > 30 BMI but more importantly the level accompanied by the most serious health consequences, such as diabetes, heart disease, stroke, orthopaedic problems, and such). More alarmingly is the youth trend, quadrupling in 20 years to now include 17% of all 2-19 year olds!

 
Inactivity remains a prime culprit, with population studies and controlled research documenting strong relationships as well as physiological processes. To say nothing of nearly anyone's "casual observation" of all the active people who "eat like horses" and remain thin, while the rest of us (jealous) folks "look at food and gain weight". (Yes those are direct quotes, from numerous sources, maybe you were one!)
 
But eating habits are indeed a factor, and the same environment that strongly discourages activity strongly encourages overeating. In America, "more is better", especially if it sounds like a better "deal".
 
Average portion sizes at fast food restaurants have increased two to five times in 50 years! Remember when we used to buy bottled cokes in 6 1/2 oz bottles? Now a 32 oz "big gulp" is one of the smaller choices!  I saw my first "all you can eat" buffet in the early 70's. Today few restaurants don't offer that option.
 
A whopper, with more fat than many of us should have in an entire day, isn't enough anymore...not when you can get a double or triple whopper for just "a little bit more"!  A quarter pounder is now the small boy on the menu at Hardees.
 
If there's one thing 100% certain to sabotage your weight control plans more than eating unhealthy food, its eating a lot of unhealthy food. And of course even healthy food becomes unhealthy if you eat too much of it!
 
Perhaps our parents/grandparents started us off in the wrong direction years ago with the admonition to "eat everything on your plate, because 'children are starving in China'".  But that was "small potatoes" (pun intended!) compared to the mega-gulp/super-size mentality we've been drawn (with not too much resistance...) into today.
 
Want the most calories, fat, sodium, cholesterol....heart disease, stroke, diabetes...for the money? Then go right along!
 
Later one you can ponder on what a "great deal" you got!
 
My prayers that your meals, as your life, are filled with enjoyment...not just filled to the max!

 

4-24-08

All I need is the Air that I Breathe! (Second hand smoke)

or, "yes, I do mind.."

and if you care at all about YOUR health, you should!
 
You're exercising, you eat better, you drink moderately or not at all, and you don't smoke. But you don't want to be rude or anti-social, you want to "fit in", or you just don't want to be known as a trouble maker. So you be a brave and considerate and kind, accepting soul and you tolerate "second hand smoke" in your work, school, social, or recreational environment.
 
We'll, you're in good company!  Or at least, a large company!
 
Second hand, or "passive" smoke, called ETS (environmental tobacco smoke) by the Environmental Protection Agency, is categorized as a Class I carcinogen, same as asbestos. It contains 250 toxic chemicals and 50 known carcinogens, including formaldehyde, benzene, ammonia, vinyl chloride, arsenic, and hydrogen cyanide.  It increases the risk of the exposed non-smoker to coronary heart disease by 25-30%.  It increases the risk of exposed infants to SIDS, and children of all ages to acute respiratory infections, ear problems, and severe asthma.  It makes blood platelets sticky, damages blood vessels, decreases coronary blood flow, and elevates heart attack risk.
 
It kills 3,000 non smokers each year through lung cancer, and another 62,000 to 65,000 through heart disease.
 
Are you avoiding it by choosing the non-smoking section and avoiding obviously smoky environments? Probably not:  A recently issued report from the Surgeon General reported that cotinine, a chemical indicator of ETS in the body, found in urine, saliva, and blood, is present in 43% of all non-smokers.  It is estimated that 126 million Americans are exposed to ETS in their homes, vehicles, workplace, and public places each year.
 
Oh, yes, the Surgeon General's conclusion: "There is no safe level of exposure; smoke-free environments are the only way to prevent exposure."
 
"Good luck with that"...as they say!
 
My wishes and prayers for a weekend full of sunshine and fresh air, and a lifetime of health!
 
(PS, if you are particularly interested in this topic, I have 60+ handy references with these and other amazing, and disturbing, facts..)lternately title

4-8-08

Want to keep your TEETH?

Greetings on a gorgeous late Tuesday afternoon...(or sometime later with some other weather...  :-)
 
Haven't given much "lip service" to teeth  :-) , but had some work done lately, then ran across some eye-opening data (straight from Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta, check it and other exciting health news out!), so here it is:
 
How to keep your teeth:
 
1. Yes, spring and well water taste undeniable better,  but one of the greatest positive impacts on our dental health, and, in fact, considered one of the greatest national health advances of the twentieth century, was the fluoridation of water.  So ENJOY it from the tap, in good conscience!
 
2. Yes brushing helps, but if you had to choose, flossing is actually more important. The little pieces of gunk that hang around are the major decay villains, not the dull color...
 
3. Yes people with regular check-ups keep their teeth longer.
 
4. But (and here's the new one on me...), good old across-the-board health health opponent SMOKING is the possibly the greatest enemy your bright pearly whites have!
 
Consider:
 
31% of all 50 year olds who smoke regularly have maintained their natural teeth at age 50
33% who "smoke some days"
47% of all who quit
and 59% who have never smoked!  Fascinating, but there's more:
 
At age 65, 41% of all daily smokers have lost all their teeth.  As opposed to 20% of non smokers.
 
70% of all periodontal disease is a direct result of smoking.
 
And some curious related factoids, I provide at risk of encouraging more of those derogatory regional put-down jokes:
 
Kentucky (28%) and West Virginia (27%) have the highest smoking rates in the country.
Kentucky (42%) and West Virginia (40%) have the highest rate of 50 year olds (and above) who have NONE of their natural teeth. (They are also the ONLY states with a rate above 40%).
 
48% of all West Virginian's over 65 have lost all their teeth. This again leads the nation. (Only Kentucky is close.)
 
What do we make of these incredible coincidences?
 
If you are a smoker and can't seem to quit, at the very least brush, floss, see a dentist regularly, and upgrade your dental insurance...
 
In Good Health,

3-27-08

The best friend your heart ever MET

Those of you who either: a.spend some time on some fairly high tech exercise equipment, or b. have taken a good Wellness or Personal Health class lately, and/or c. consider reading through exercise physiology "recreational reading" may have come across, if not become familiar with the term "MET". (not the baseball team or the opera...)
 
short for, and the standard abbreviation for, "METabolic equivalent".
 
or, the amount of energy that it takes you to do nothing but stay alive! (a good plan, and my hearty recommendation!).
 
Quite useful, when you know how to use it. Any aerobic exercise, at any specific intensity level (e.g., any speed/grade combination on the treadmill, any pace of walking or running, any combination of resistance and pedaling speed on the exercise bike, a step aerobics class using a specific step height at a specific cadence...) has a specific energy requirement (amount of oxygen consumed per minute, which equates to a specific number of calories burned per minute), and thus a specific MET designation or rating.
 
Use it as a "common denominator" for exercise: if you normally treadmill at, say, 8 METS (and by the way if you do your are quite fit already!), you can play with any speed/grade combination that is comfortable to maintain the same workout level, or try one of those cool elliptical machines (most now read METS). Or use a chart (available at numerous on-line sources; zap me a request and I'll share one with you!) to determine average MET levels of about any exercise you can mention. (And some you wouldn't...)
 
As an example, walking on a flat surface at a 20 minute per mile pace requires 3 .3 METS. A 15 minute per mile pace about 4 METS. "Moderate" racquetball 9 METS.  "Light" SCUBA diving 4 METS.  "Heavy" cross country skiing 13 METS.
 
Now the "punch line": increase your MET capacity just ONE little MET, and you decrease your heart attack risk by 20%! Two METS, and it decreases 30-40%. (No, you can't ever get it to ZERO,  but that was a good thought!)
 
Plus, the higher your MET capacity, the higher MET level you can exercise at comfortably, so, at the same effort level and in the same time, the more calories you can burn per minute. Per hour. Per week.....
 
Pretty cool, no?
 
(For a more technical and probably less...if at all...useful explanation, come by the office...)
 
Or just keep it in mind as you play with your exercise routines!
 
With my blessings!

3-18-08

Running Away from Diabetes and Heart Disease: Steady Does It!

Beautiful day in "The Valley", go take a walk... a steady, comfortable pace, and feel good about it! 

 

It is no secret (at least from my regular readers) that exercise is your best defense against the development of our “new epidemics” of obesity and the closely related adult-onset diabetes.

 

But does it matter just how we go about that exercise?

 

“Somewhat” to “quite a bit”, actually!

 

In a recently published article (Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, official journal of the American College of Sports Medicine…March 2008 if you’re a “technical reader”….), the researchers found that among their subjects (inactive, overweight men), those walking a steady 30 minutes each session improved their insulin sensitivity and increased their use of fats as an energy source much more than those who completed the exact same amount of exercise with “interval training” (6 five minute sessions) at a higher intensity.

 

Our current “official” recommendation for minimum exercise (straight from the Surgeon General, reflecting data from the National Institute of Health, and endorsed by the ACSM), is to “accumulate 30 minutes of exercise most days of the week.)  This based on our knowledge that: 1. there is a big difference in mortality and morbidity rates (as in, who dies and who gets sick a lot…) between that level and nothing, and, 2. It’s hard to get a lot of people to do a lot more; this is considered a reasonable goal for the busiest or most unfit individual.

 

But this current study is consistent with suggestions from previous observations and published data, and a quite logical extension of what we do know: the longer one gets into an exercise session, at a moderate level, the more one begins to use fat, versus carbohydrates (sugars) as an energy source. And we know that better fat utilization is correlated with better insulin sensitivity (less insulin resistance), which results in better blood sugar control and a reduction in the risk of development of type II diabetes…along with better control once/if it is developed.

 

So, while breaking down your exercise into a number of shorter sessions will certainly improve your fitness and overall health, and decrease your rate of (just about any) disease and premature death (from just about any cause), cranking out your 30 minutes at once will help you more with weight control (burning as opposed to storing the fats) and both avoidance of (type II, “adult onset”), and coping with (both types) diabetes.

 

Plus you will have a nice half hour break to “lose yourself” in fresh air, scenery, reflection on technical matters such as this…, prayer…   or just an escape from annoying jobs.  Or people!

 

Oh, one more point: for those insistent on dashing and gasping through your session, “have at it” if you like, but the “ideal intensity” for the fat-utilization was estimated to be around 65% of your maximum. Essentially a brisk walk or, dependent on your fitness level, a slow jog.  Those in the study doing intervals at 95% maximum (essentially, a race…) improved fitness but not fat-utilization or insulin sensitivity (they’ll be more useful on a relay team but you’ll probably outlive them!). Of course few (living) people could maintain 95% intensity for 30 minutes anyway…

 

So there you have it, or can have it: a comfortable, enjoyable session, and terrific health and fitness benefits!

 

My blessings for a comfortable, enjoyable, terrific day and end of the week, and a blessed

3-13-08

Doing Nothing IS doing SOMETHING WRONG: cost of inactivity

I remember an old adage used by (actually, several) former supervisors to comfort me after what I felt like was a pretty costly, or at least pretty stupid, mistake: “It’s no big deal, just remember, the only people who do nothing wrong are the people who do nothing!”

 

Whether or not we can blame all our mistakes on our incredibly industrious nature, and consider them inevitable (and minor) consequences of all our vast and wonderful accomplishments (that’s my choice, how about you???), it is a comforting thought, no?

 

But in the case of physical activity, it is far from the truth.

 

Doing nothing is the mistake, and it’s a big, and often, fatal one.

 

And the consequences come a lot sooner than you would think.

 

In an examination of large population studies, involving over 13,000 subjects, it was shown that just 6 months of inactivity produced significant changes in all these areas, resulting in increased risk and incidences of chronic diseases and conditions including diabetes, heart disease, cancer, and other big nasties: higher body weight, waist circumference, waist-hip ration, visceral fat, total abdominal fat, LDL particle number, small LDL number, and total LDL (these are the “bad” cholesterol guys..), and decreases in insulin sensitivity and fitness level.

 

Just six months!

 

So, bad news, and more bad news.

 

The good news?  Most if not all of these are countered by regular exercise.  The recommendation?  Start with 30 minutes, “most days”, but adapt the exercise to maintain your current (or appropriate) weight. (More is generally better, but at some point you may have to also incorporate the “push-away” exercise, as in “push away from the dining table..”)

 

30 minutes. Something.  Most days.  Truly “no big deal”!

 

Unless, of course, you do “do nothing”!

 

My prayer is that you don’t make that particular mistake!

 

2-15-08

Two plus two equals five: unequal effects of increasing or decreasing exercise levels on body weight

Most of us go through periods where we significantly increase, or (unfortunately, more often) decrease, our amount of exercise.  And we probably notice an accompanying decrease, or (unfortunately, more often) increase in our body weight. And we may further notice that, as time moves on, the little needle on the scales has an easier time going up than coming back down.
 
Well, feel "cheated" if it helps you, but don't feel alone!
 
Reason would suggest, and science seem to support, that the decrease in exercise quantity enough to produce a gain of X pounds over Y period of time would be off-set by the same amount of increase over the same amount of time.
 
Real life, however, is not necessarily subject to our "reasonable" predictions based on our current "understandings" of "observed phenonema". (A workable definition of "science" by the way..")
 
Recently published longitudinal studies of regular exercisers provided one more interesting example: When dietary intake was controlled (or accounted for), the predicted (we do know what amount of what intensity of exercise burns what amount of calories) weight loss from increases in exercise was somewhat delayed (ye ole "set-point theory", perhaps?), while the predicted gain from an equivalent decrease in exercise took effect almost immediately (how how "fair" is that??!)  Futher, and a tad more discouraging, was the finding that in nearly all cases the gain was slighlty greater than the loss from identical sized changes in exercise quantity.
 
A further finding with perhaps even more implications: the same quantitative change in exercise had a more pronounced effect at the lower levels. In other words, decreasing your exercise from say 2 hours per week to nothing will set back your weight control efforts more than a decrease from 6 hours a week to 4.
 
Conclusions? Well, unless you are the rare individual who has found their complaining actually does somehow change reality (for the better, anyway..), you may find it more beneficial to work with things the way they are rather than the way you (and in this case, perhaps all of us), think they should be.
 
Exercise regularly, and stick with it!
 
And if (when?) you do experience periods where you must (always, of course, unavoidable circumstances coming through no fault of your own...) decrease your exercise output, try decreasing your dietary intake as well.  And when you get back on track (this time due, of course, soley to your own merits, against all odds!!!), give yourself time to "recover"!
 
My blessings for an emotionally restful, physically active weekend!
 

2-8-09

Sick and Tired worrying about being Sick and Tired? (Exercise, Aging, and Immunity)

Welcome to a bright sunny Friday (at least from where I sit)!
 
Getting older we can't help.  But we're in good company: it is estimated that by 2020 one in five Americans will be 65 or older.
 
Which could be good or bad: we can be looking happily at a lot of free time and the vitality to use it...or more dreary and compromised years than our "more fortunate" predecessors. We can contribute to our families and to society, or be a burden to both.
 
We can be sick or we can be well.
 
The immune system does tend to lose its ability with the passage of time.  And it is affected at any stage of our lives by chronic stress.  This we know. The devastating effects we try to avoid knowing, or at least facing.  Or, more importantly, doing anything about.
 
Animal studies show us that the detrimental effects on the immune system of physical and emotional stressors (no, I don't know exactly how they aggravate those little laboratory rats ..) are greatly reduced by exercise, and that the detrimental effects of aging on immunity are likewise mediated. 
 
Simple examples are much quicker wound healing of the exercisers (whether little and furry and four-legged or tall and hairless and two-legged).  More important are lower rates of almost any communicable disease. We can quantify specific chemical changes.  That means nothing to most of us.  We can feel and see and live the difference. That means a lot to all of us.
 
We've also found that older individuals are subject to a lot of physical (things will eventually break down) and emotional stressors.  Adjusting to retirement, financial concerns, loss of a sense of productivity to name just a few. So, high levels of stress, less resistance to it; exposure to communicable diseases, less ability to fend them off. Add that to the increased prevalence of all those chronic diseases we talk about so much (heart disease, diabetes, and such).
 
And the picture looks less bright than the weather outside. Unless, of course, we choose to be in a different picture.
 
The passage of time I can't stop. Wouldn't want to, anyway...a lot of really terrific things come my way.  But growing old..physically and emotionally, and sick, well, I believe I'll see if I can't just pass a lot of that part by.  (On a bike, on foot, in a pool...whatever..)
 
What about you!
 
My blessings for a bright, sunny day...outside your home, and inside you!

2-1-08

Salt of the Earth and Fat of the Land: Hypertension Truths

I could entitle this "same old same old, and then some", but I felt really clever with my little word plays, so...
 
High blood pressure, someone elses problem?  Hardly, 1/3 of all Americans are now so afflicted.  As with diabetes, this chronic, lifestyle disease parallels ("follows" would be more precise) our eating and exercise patterns.
 
The "usual suspects": a diet low in fruits and vegetables and high in sodium, along with obesity and lack of exercise.
 
Our usual approach?  Ignore the culprits and throw some expensive "magic pills" at the problem.  It's a lot easier.
 
Problem is, it doesn't work so good.  Proof? We have been throwing magic pills at it for 50 years.  The simpliest and cheapest, 1957 variety diuretics, are still about as effective, and much more cost effective, than any other solution.
 
With the exception of lifestyle changes: imrpoved eating and exercise and resultant weight management.
 
Researchers and spokespersons with the AMA (American Medical Association) and Johns Hopkins, in reviewing the "results" of 60 plus of these fabulous "magic pills" have reached that conclusion.
 
WOW, "who would've 'thunk it'"?
 
Why? Well, for one thing, approximately 1/3 of all Americans and over 1/2 of those with high blood pressure are especially "salt sensitive": the more sodium, the higher the blood pressure.  Virtually everyone's blood pressure is affected...in either direction...by weight changes.  Fruits and vegetables help in many known (high fiber, general health improvement, weight control) and highly suspected/assumed (anti-oxidants) ways.  And, face it, like the old Coke commercial, "things go better with exercise"! 
 
So quit looking for the "magic bullet"...we already have it!  It just doesn't come in capsule form!
 
My blessings for a safe, cozy end of the week (I'm looking outside at a sheet of ice) and a relaxing weekend!

1-26-07

Go work out or Go Crazy! (Exercise and Dementia)

Feel like you're "losing your mind"?  Well, we know the best way to at least slow the rate of your loss!
 
A review of longitudinal studies following between several hundred up to several thousand (5925, specifically) subjects showed a strong inverse relationship between exercise and cognitive decline, and between cardiovascular fitness level and cognitive decline, in every case. The researchers found also that the major cardiovascular risk factors (blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and obesity) were independently and positively related to cognitive decline.  And of course all these in turn were strongly and negatively correlated with exercised and fitness level.
 
As far as mechanisms, "the usual suspects" were again "indicted": exercise promotes better blood flow to the brain (and everything else that gets blood, which is to say everything else), better stress coping and a generally better state of mind. In addition, they found evidence of reduced levels of inflammatory markers (already accepted to be related to cognitive as well as physical decline) and suspected enhanced neuronal function as well (which has been shown in animal studies and may actually include formation of new blood vessels and neurons!)
 
So we must now accept that it's not the crazy "gym rats", the "party poopers" opting for an after work walk rather than an after work drink, the nuts jogging before dawn rather than hitting the snooze alarm another 4 times, or even the pain-recognition-challenged bikers out in the minus something wind chill that are "losing their minds".
 
It's the rest of us!!!
 
My blessings for a physical and thoughtful weekend!

 

 

1-10-08

Some is best, more is a bit better!

While we do have clear evidence, and I have constantly emphasized, that the greatest gains in health status, life expectancy, you-name-the-disease risk, life satisfaction, you-name-the-benefit, come when we go from sedentary to "moderately active" (30 minutes, consecutive or accumulated, of SOMETHING involving motion, on most days), for those with greater ambition, higher pain tolerance, and/or more time to devote, a bit more WILL make you, well, a bit better!
 
We know that sedentary versus active individuals have about twice the "all cause mortality" rate.
 
But "high fit" individuals reduce their risk another 20% or so from "moderately fit" (the 30 minute of something folks...), and the "highest fit" (bona-fide athletes, 5-10 mile at a time joggers), decrease their risk another 5%.
 
And of course doing a bit more has other benefits, such as an aid in weight control, great for stress relief, can be a great social activity, and you'll feel better and more alert...more of the time!
 
My blessings for a fun, stress free, "feel good" weekend!

1-5-08

Fresh Starts, and Other Fallacies (or, New Year's Resolutions and Lou Holtz)

Happy New Year all!
 
Gotten started on your "New Year's Resolution" yet?  Your "fresh start"? In golf it's called a "mulligan". In tennis your second serve. In football a penalty may give you a replay after you fumbled or got sacked.
 
In "real life", however, with few exceptions, everything actually counts!
 
Sometimes, you can repair some of the damage...to some extent.  If your first heart attack didn't KILL you, you may have a chance to adapt to running fairly efficiently on one less cylinder (no, the dead tissue does NOT come back to life, and damaged artery walls remain highly susceptible to clogging and clotting). If you treated someone unfairly or unkindly, be assured an unforced, sincere apology will ALWAYS help.  But damage has been done, and scars remain.  To blood vessels, to heart tissue, to lungs, to people, to relationships.
 
Why not just avoid the damage in the first place?  Not always possible? Acknowledged, but do a brief inventory on how many times it really WASN'T!
If you just did the right thing in the first place!
 
I attended a high level corporate sponsored seminar on success once. Speaker was Lou Holtz, one of our most successful football coaches ever, now one of the most interesting (and amusing) sports analysts. 
 
Expected some deep and complex secrets of his extraordinary success. 
 
At the very least, the key to maintenance of the exceptional energy levels of an apparent workaholic.
 
What I heard was the simplest, and most general, of messages.  Repeated and illustrated in his somewhat off-beat way, but all he really said was:
 
1. Do the right thing.
2. Do the best you can.
3. Treat other people the way you want to be treated.
 
Simple, but profound.  Totally familiar, no? (Although I trust he'll be not sued for plagiarism by Moses or the New Testament writers  :-)
 
Any health educator can tell you one of the primary causes of stress, and in fact most of what we blame on "bad luck", is the result of doing what you really know is NOT the right thing.  Anyone who manages people can point to inevitable failure of those who give less than 100 percent.  And everyone wishes the "golden rule" is applied to THEM...whether they recognize that THEY should be accountable in applying it to OTHERS, or not.
 
Keeping this in mind also can simplify your New Year's resolution, while increasing it's value ten-fold:
 
Rather than "be a thinner person", "be a more fit person", "be a more well-read person", "be a wealthier person", "be a smarter person", you can just make it a priority to be a better person!
 
That's my plan, anyway, and I hope any efforts you put in that direction are equally blessed!
 
Have a best ever year in 2008...all the way around!

 12-6-07

No your lungs wont' freeze, BUT... (frostbite and other bad things!)

Hi and welcome to WINTER!  egad!
 
Had another topic in mind but somehow on my bike ride to work, during which the temperature peaked at about 22 degrees, this topic occurred...
 
I had earlier addressed the frozen lungs issue (as a review, no they won't...)
 
BUT your nose and toes and fingers just may!
 
Assuming you aren't out long enough to develop a fully grown case of hypothermia, your greatest danger is frostbite. And ANY exposed skin is highly susceptible. And unexposed skin as well if you are out a bit longer. 
 
Further, this can happen in minutes.  Simply put, the fluid in the tissues freezes. Resulting in temporary to permanent damage and discoloration, all the way to amputation (think of those National Geographic specials with the Arctic explorers).
 
Prevention? Mittens are by far the best for your hands, as the fingers help warm each other.  Wool socks for the feet, but not so thick it restricts circulation.  Remember your strongest ally against the cold is your own wonderfully adaptive blood supply mechanism, don't mess with it!
 
And cover the rest of you too...if you allow body heat to dissipate through, say, an uncovered head, bare legs, or a barely covered torso, your body then has to compensate by further restricting the WARM BLOOD flow to your little fingers and toes and nose so it can direct more to your internal organs..so you can stay alive, in spite of your folly. At the expense of some really cold, and maybe frostbitten digits.
 
Keep also in mind the body heat you'll build up; if exercising fairly vigorously as opposed to say walking you'll of course wear less, and use layers (and synthetics that wick sweat away), BUT you'll still want to protect the skin, ESPECIALLY fingers, toes, and face.
 
So here's my wish for some invigorating but misery, pain, and damage free outdoor activity this winter!

11-20-07

Surviving Holiday Eating: Look Down but Look Ahead

To all of US eagerly awaiting the Thanksgiving day "food-fest":

 
Herein I offer my annual, "surviving the Holiday eating" tips!
 
First, as a scary reminder: the average American (and we ARE the experts at weight gain, remember!), gains FIVE (5) to SEVEN (7) pounds between Thanksgiving and New Year's! (Don't bother to ask me what percentage of that is muscle...)
 
Another curious "factoid": the AVERAGE American puts down almost FIVE THOUSAND (5,000) calories at the single Thanksgiving dinner!  (3,500 extra calories equals one extra pound...of fat...thus you have probably added a full pound at one sitting, in addition to your total energy needs for the entire day...)
 
If we then proceeded to run a marathon (or two...) we could balance this out.  But more commonly...more TRADITIONALLY, we retire to watch the 'Skins take another embarrassing drubbing at the hands of the central Texas show-boaters. While snacking on leftovers and sweets.  To work up an appetite.  For more leftovers, in a few hours!  (This is if you don't have the obligatory 2nd or even 3rd Thanksgiving meal, as there are so many kin to enjoy and/or please and/or pacify!)
 
And somewhere in there we get sleepy and probably nap.  Is it the magical tryptophan in the turkey, the "usual suspect"?  Not really.  This chemical does tend to stimulate relaxation and even prompt the release of our "feel good", "emotional stability" serotonin. (the main ingredient, by the way and not coincidentally, in Paxil and most anti-depressants...)
 
No, that sleepiness is really more about just the body turning down other processes to focus more exclusively on turning all those extra calories into nice little chunks of body fat!  Meanwhile, the chore of digesting so MUCH at one time does in fact stress many of your body systems unduly: as an example, your risk of a heart attack, whatever it may be, is temporarily and significantly increased after such a food-fest..
 
Then again, no one gains five to seven pounds at one Thanksgiving and one Christmas meal, even with one calorie laden (alcohol has 7 calories per gram, right there beneath pure fat's 9...) New Year's celebration thrown in.  But we seem to adopt the "oh well, I've blown it anyway, so I'll just forget any restraint until my New Year's resolution) attitude.
 
Therefore, my specific plan to help you enjoy the holiday feasts and festivities without paying so dearly later on:
 
"Look down, but look ahead":
 
Look down at the meal. Admire it.  Savor it!  Eat it slowly!  Satisfaction comes from the experience, not the pure mass taken in.
 
Look ahead: How will those extra bites, extra drinks, affect you right after the meal while you groan and moan and swear off eating forever?  Or the first of the year when you have 5-7 pounds to lose, rather than 1 or two.  Or another few months later when you feel uncomfortable in your clothes?  Several more months later when you need new clothes (and not because you wore anything out?)  Years later when your doctor diagnoses bona-find diabetes or heart disease???
 
My memory being, in a beloved phrase of my grandma, "about an inch long", I always look for little helps to remind me of such things, so herein is my submission for the (near) perfect acronym:
 
What activity relies MOST on the simple ability to look ahead?  Chess!  CHESS.  C.H.E.S.S....
 
Christmas Holiday Eating Survival Strategy!
 
(It'll work equally well for Thanksgiving, or, I suspect, Hanukah/Chanukah, or any other holiday for which over-eating may be a federally-mandated requirement, but I've yet to make a legitimate or even readily pronounceable word from HCESS, RCESS, KCESS, etc...so use it more generically if it helps)
 
So accept my blessings for a wonder Thanksgiving holiday, as you LOOK AHEAD to a great extended Holiday season!
 

11-8-07

Exercise, Weight Control, and Diabetes: A little goes a LONG way!

11-9-07
 
Fit-Tips: Exercise and Diabetes prevention: A little goes a long way!
 
We've known for some time that exercise and weight control are critical to prevention of Type II ("adult onset") diabetes, and treatment of both Type I and Type II.  In point of fact, the dramatic increase in Type II (essentially doubling in last decadenow 95% of all cases when it once was 5%...) almost exactly parallels the rise in obesity (now almost one in 3 adults) and overweight/obesity (two-thirds of all Americans).  And that exercise is the most critical factor in prevention of weight gain.  And that exercise also directly impacts diabetes development through several mechanisms. 
 
Now several recently conducted and other recently reviewed large scale studies, published in ACSM's Exerise and Sports Science Reviews, provides more specifics and points dramatically to appropriate interventions ! 
 
Which are simpler than you might think!
 
Firstly, a moderate exercise and reasonable eating program was shown to reduce diabetes over twice as effectively as the current "state of the art" medication specifically for that purpose, Metformin. (58% versus 31% reduction in new cases). This also indicated the importance of even modest weight losses, as the "lifestyle" group lost only an average of about 6 pounds over two years!
 
Other studies actually isolated the effects of the exercise alone, exclusive of dietary changes, and found over 70% less risk of diabetes among the exercisers!
 
In point of fact, all studies reviewed, involving a low of hundreds and a high of thousands of subjects, showed diabetes rates reduced by around 50% or more for the exercisers. This was invariably accompanied by unintentional, modest weight losses.
 
Conversely, a "control group" of middle aged men, over 6 months of just continuing to be inactive and eat as before, actually gained an average of 1% body weight (doesn't sound like much? do the math over a few years..), and showed significant worsening of nearly all the known "risk factors" for diabetes: body weight, waist circumference, visceral fat, abdominal fat, fasting insulin, insulin sensitivity, fitness level, LDL number and size.  (Keep in mind this "control" group is simply the average, "apparently healthy" American...YOU, perhaps?)  I use quotes for "control" because control groups are not supposed to CHANGE...but in this case we learned as much from THEM as the treatment group! 
 
So what exactly is the "message to take home" (or maybe, to the gym?!!)
 
An overview of all these studies shows that, as you might reason before any analysis, to prevent becoming the latest member of a huge and disastrous epidemic, you need to simply exercise enought to prevent weight gain.  Or, to keep your risk from increasing, enough to prevent further weight gain.  Which tended to be around the equivalent of 8 miles of walking per week for most subjects. About 2 total hours of brisk exercise of some type.  In essense, just about our current recommendations of "30 minutes of something most days of the week".  More for some, less for some.  Watch the scale.  CONTROL your eating.  But mainly, get your body moving! 
 
By the way, there are 168 hours in a week. Two hours is just over 1% of your time. If you find a more "cost-effective" use of your time, please let us all know!!! 
 
My blessings for a healthy, disease-free  weekend. Year.  And LIFE! 

 

 

10-18-07

"Salt of the Earth"?

 
Salt...spoken of highly in the Bible. Used in many analogies, usually positive. 
Before refrigeration, an absolute necessity as a preservative.  Still does the job quite well, still one of our TOP preservatives.
Also, and most relevant to this little message, great to spice up foods.
Since it's such good stuff, why do all the nutritionists, Heart Association folks, fitness folks (oops) and others make such a fuss?
Simple: we just go way overboard! 
Most foods in their natural form have NO salt. So adding it made sense.
Most processed foods today have plenty. Read the ingredients list and nutritional breakdown ("sodium") on the labels of most any canned vegetable, most any frozen entree, most any cracker or chip.  It's already "filled to the brim".
Then, of course, we just "pour it on"!
I've often been amused watching this phenomena at fast food restaurants:
The french fry guy throws another batch from the deep fryer to the hot surface, and dumps enough salt to, I'm sure, kill about 200 slugs, or totally BURY half that many.
The patron takes his order, sits down, and, without tasting them, grabs the shaker on the table to "finish the job".  I keep thinking there must be some limit to how much salt can even stay ON the fries, but I suppose the GREASE keeps it there.
And so it goes.
Some folks can handle it better than others, a little bloating here and there the only apparent result.
Others, as much as 30% of the population, are moderately to highly "salt sensitive".
As the salt intake increases, so does the fluid build-up, blood volume rises dramatically, pressure in the vessels increases. Result: kidney problems, maybe kidney disease. High blood pressure, maybe stroke, maybe heart attack.  Not good things.
American Heart Association AND American Dietetic Association agree about 2400 mg (2.4 grams) is plenty.
That goes a long way as a sprinkle here and there on an otherwise "innocent" food, say a nice ripe tomatoes.
On the other hand, eat one dill pickle and you're almost there. 
Or a couple order of fries, and you get the bonus of all the grease!  So the extra you DUMP on will stick!
Couple practical suggestions:
1. Get rid of the salt shaker at your table. After the initial shock, you'll actually start tasting the FOOD again!
2. Use more pepper, and other spices. Gives variety. A few we even suspect of having anti-oxidants. Garlic may decrease coronary risk. At minimum, they won't HURT you.
 
My blessings for a spicy, but HEALTHY, happy weekend!

 

 

0-11-07

Sugar: How Sweet it ISN'T!

Got some thanks for (more or less) defending some favorite vices last few times, but, alas, today I can offer only a double edged sword. With one edge perhaps a bit sharper than the other...
 
Sugar...whether refined, brown, powdered, under some other name (suspect anything on the label ending in  "ose")...your body doesn't much care (even honey, by the way, works just about the same in your system):  A little here and there will, at worse, promote tooth decay. A bit mixed in a beverage will indeed improve your performance in an hour or more endurance event.  But a heaping helping with breakfast, whether as the primary component of the waffle syrup, the mound on your breakfast cereal (or in the case of most kids cereals, the even BIGGER mound within), will have not so tasty consequences:
 
High consumption of simple sugars triggers a higher production of insulin, which helps you store more of those calories in the form of FAT.  Your body then burns less fat as fuel, and you produce more triglycerides (another form of fats that is suspect in clogging arteries...).  Your appetite actually INCREASES.  Your energy level may surge initially, but later in the morning will dip below its normal level (your insulin working extra hard to bring down the blood sugar. so you can LIVE!).  These are the mechanisms, published studies confirm that subjects consuming more breakfast sugar, versus complex carbohydrates, will indeed eat significantly more for lunch. And generally, voluntarily, exert less energy between breakfast and lunch.
 
There you have it.  "By any other name it TASTES as sweet". But it doesn't necessarily treat you that way!
 
Enjoy your breakfasts AND the rest of your weekend!
 
With my blessings!

 

 

10-4-07

Environmental AND Physical Health

Probably you can guess MY personal suggestion for Environmental Awareness Week. Month. Year. Forever:
 
Keeping in mind that private auto travel is one of our WORSE polluters, one of our GREATEST users of "fossil fuels", and clearly our LEAST efficient form of travel...
Keeping in mind that INACTIVITY is one of our GREATEST health risks (and I can give you many stats that support it as THE GREATEST cause of premature death and disease among Americans)..
 
Why not "kill all three birds with one stone"...
 
The one stone that will keep YOU alive?
 
BIKE to work, if at all possible. If not, car pool..leaving early enough for you and your buddies to enjoy each other's company on a pre-work day brisk walk!
 
My blessings for a environmentally and HEALTH friendly end of the week and weekend,
 

9-278-07

In defense of Eggs and Peanut Butter

To all my health-seeking friends, a happy end of (hopefully) another good week, happy start to (hopefully) another great weekend!
 
Last week we defended coffee. Well, more or less...
 
This week we defend another two of my all-time favorites: The HIGH CHOLESTEROL bad guy eggs and the HIGH FAT bad guy peanut butter.
 
Eggs first: Yes they are higher in cholesterol than many foods. However most of us get many times the cholesterol  in those juicy steaks, hamburgers, hot dogs, and such as in the otherwise near perfect egg. And it has been well demonstrated that saturated fats in the diet have a much more profound effect on blood cholesterol than does actual dietary cholesterol itself.  In other words, the bacon, the sausage, your NON-DAIRY creamer (full of coconut oil which is twice as high in saturated fat as, say, LARD....) which you use to help LOWER?? your cholesterol, and likely as not your healthy-looking granola look-alike snacks are causing the real damage.  Average egg, 213 mg cholesterol. A couple a week or so works just fine with an overally healthy eating plan.  Great protein source. And if you do run borderline high cholesterol and this is a legitimate target for further reduction, just use the whites...also high in protein, no cholesterol, virtually no fat.
 
Peanut butter?  Great protein source.  Plenty of fat but mostly unsaturated, and NO trans fat.  Also high in fiber.  Admittedly high in calories (140-170 calories for a two tablespoon dollop, which will give you one fully grown sandwich) but quite filling.. just don't sit down and eat the jar.
 
In most instances, Mom was right.  In this case, so are the kids!!!
 
Enjoy your breakfasts and lunches this weekend, with my blessings!

 

 

9-19-07

Perking up with Coffee?

A plethora of studies have been conducted on coffee.  As an athletic performance aid.  As a culprit in heart disease.  Even as a potential carcinogen.  You name it.
No time or space to even give you an extrememly general review of the results.  So here's what I believe, based on all we KNOW:
 
If you have no heart problems, no blood pressure problems, and are not prone to anxiety, 1-3 cups a day almost (there's that "out clause"..) certainly won't hurt, and may well help by increasing your alertness, or calming you down.  We suspect it has anti-oxidant properties (we suspect that of a lot of foods, by the way).  And it may slightly increase your metabolism, temporarily. (No, don't count on that for weight control, the amount you'd need to make a difference in the scale would make a more more significant difference in your heart and in the wrong direction...!) It may help your performance in very long (over an hour) endurance events. (or not...) And there is no evidence of a cancer relationship.
 
And if your emotional state requires it, whether due to physical or psychological addiction, it's a far cry better than a lot of other drugs...
 
But it does tend to raise blood pressure, in some cases and for some individuals by 10-20 points systolic and/or diastolic.  It will raise your heart rate and can irritate your cardiovascular system and even precipitate abnormal beats.  Can raise your anxiety levels (and you drink it to calm you down...), can keep you from sleeping, and can keep you running to the restroom.  Which, although generally only moderately annoying and maybe even funny, can indicate a developing bladder and even kidney problem, related to you abusing them both with chronic diuretic overdoses..
 
So don't throw it out or swear it off right away, just keep it under control.  And make sure, based on your health status and reaction, you know what that means.
 
To you!
 
In Good Health and with my Blessings for a great end of the Week,
 

 

 

9-13-07

Metabolic Syndrome be danged, just EXERCISE!

Aha, now that I (hopefully) have your attention, I must back off that bold statement.
But not FAR off it!
"Metabolic Syndrome" describes a combination of ("either/or") obesity and dyslipidemia: high cholesterol, low HDL ("good cholesterol"), high triglycerides, and maybe a few other out of whack metabolic markers which happen to be rather strong CARDIAC RISK FACTORS.
It's not real in the sense that its not a specific disease or condition, but it IS real in the sense that it can hurt you. Badly.
For example, in the overall population, those WITH "metabolic syndrom" have over TWICE the risk of developing, and dying, from Cardio-vascular disease.  And a 30% increased risk of dying, prematurely, period. (I.e., a 1.3 times normal "all cause mortality" rate).
However (and this is a really really BIG HOWEVER), the same statistical analysis of the same mega-study showed that among the 'fit" individuals, both cardiac risk and all cause mortality were essentially the same between those WITH and those WITHOUT the metabolic syndrome.
So if you exercise, you shouldn't be concerned with your lipids and body fat? Of course you should. All risk factors are real, and other studies (and probably follow up analysees of this one) will clearly indicate that even the most dedicated exerciser has much to gain, and nothing to lose, from controlling those other factors. (i.e., 'behaving!')
But it DOES mean that, if you DON'T exercise, you SHOULD be concerned.
Period!
My blessings for an active, healthy, disease-free year!

 

 

5-8-07

 

Summertime and the Livin' is Easy... (keep active!)

Or maybe not, but at the very least it offers balmy weather and, for (hopefully!) many, if not most of us, vacation time, fun trips, and at least a bit lighter workload.

 
Which is a GOOD thing, no doubt, for your mental AND physical state.
 
So make it even BETTER...keep up the exercise habit.  Or maybe even TAKE IT UP.  If nothing else, the days are longer...!
 
The problem with any change in routine is, well, just that...even if it's a desired change it gets us out of a routine that serves us well, such as a daily (or at least regular) pattern of exercise. And probably eating.  And maybe reading, and study, and such, but that's for another day. (If not another author...  :-)
 
Here's something that may help you BRCC folks with adhering to, or developing, your positive health habit: at (very...) long last, we are indeed ready to open our little FITNESS CENTER for business.  YOUR business!
 
Starting with an open house:  Friday, May 25, 11-1:00.  Workout and general health and exercise advice, assistance with any intimidating looking machines, and, of course, free munchies!
 
In the meantime, visit the fitness center link to my website (which you can click on below).  There are instructional video's for EVERY station, as well as written info to help you get the most out of your exercise time.  And, of course, the Release form that you'll NEED to download and sign and return to my box so you will not be beaten with a wet carp and hung up by your heels for non-compliance. (Not really, but it IS a requirement, for obvious reasons...!)
 
(For you fitness friends afar, you'll at least be amused with yours truly bopping about the machines..)
 
Hope to see many of you Friday, the 25th... you can use the lower, back entrance directly into the center (shortens your walk, we don't want to OVERdo it the first day, do we???!)
 
In the meantime, get excited about this great opportunity and enjoy God's beautiful bright sunny day's we're suddenly blessed with!
 
PS: Keep in mind that over the summer I won't have access to the Fit-Tip channel on a regular basis...but I'll get in and zap you a reprimand or encouragement "here and there"... So I haven't forgotten you, and trust YOU won't forget to take care of yourselves!!!
 

 

 

4-24-07: Take a little walk for your mind, body, and soul!

 

Greetings to all my healthy-minded* friends!  

 
( *no, that's not really a requirement for receiving this, just your indulgence!)
 
It's a beautiful time, what a blessing is this recent weather.
 
And also a stressful time...for we "academians" it means "crunch time" with final exams, papers, projects to grade, grades to average, final student "pleas" abounding, (they just realized they had things due...weeks ago...and such..!?), grades to average, preliminary plans for upcoming term(s).
 
And for nearly all of us the trauma of the Tech tragedy.  Closer to some of us than others, but impacting nearly all of us.
 
You've noticed (I hope!) you haven't received a Fit-Tip for a while; yes my mind, and heart, has been in Blacksburg as well. (Between my parents, siblings, children, and daughter-in-law we count around 13 Virginia Tech degrees; I had a brief teaching tenure there as well..)
 
No, putting this out of mind, or even on the backburner, is the last thing I would recommend.  In fact, I would request instead you keep up your prayers, and any other tangible way you can think of to help anyone more directly effected than yourself.  For as long as you can; for the families of victims this will never end.
 
But I do suggest you remember to take a little exercise break...loosens up the body, invigorates the mind, increases the alertness while reducing the stress response, and we could all use a little uplift from the "natural high" of those endorphins.
 
Enjoy the weather as well, God's beautiful creation is always soothing for the soul!
 
(Now back to work?  :-)
 
God Bless,

 

 

4-4-07

More Good News: Something is Good, Something More is Somewhat better!

Steven Blair, past president of the American College of Sports Medicine and one of the (in my opinion THE, and I've heard a number of his presentations live!) top exercise physiologists in the country (if not world), reported at a recent conference the findings of a 25 year follow up with over 2000 men (so rule out any "coincidence" explanations):
 
Dividing the men into four groups based on level of fitness, he found that, in comparison to the most fit quartile, the 2nd quartile had a 1.6 times higher mortality rate at 25 years, the 3rd quartile a 2.8 times higher rate, and the 4th, lowest fit, a 4.5 times greater mortality rate!  Scary stuff, but really GOOD news: of all the cardiac and general (he looked at death rates from ANY cause, by the way, not just heart disease...) risks, this is the one thing we can do the most about!  Cholesterol and blood pressure respond to lifestyle changes but have a genetic component, as does diabetic risk, and the Y chromosome effect (the "more male" you are, whether a male or female, the worse off you are) is totally out of our control.
 
But we can ALL exercise, and the top 25% fitness level of a group like this, or the population at large, is within everyone's grasp.
 
We just need to start grasping!!!
 
My blessings for a beautiful day, with at least SOME of it outside in the sun and at least some of it involving "reaching and grasping" for health!

 

 

3-28-07

 

Now the "Good" News!

Other than this beautiful weather, I'd promised some GOOD news on our National health status, to balance all my dark warnings, so here it is:

 
Basically, the good news is that the bad news is not quite so bad as it has been!
 
Life Expectancy: it was 47 in 1900, its now 77.6.  Most is attributed to our control of infectious disease, and our decrease in infant mortality (averaging all those 0's into the data bank really pulled the average down).  However, a significant part is a relatively recent decline in deaths from coronary heart disease and stroke!  (Some of that, admittedly, due to us keeping victims barely alive but really sick through medical technology,  but a good bit is due to actual prevention..i.e. lifestyle!) 
 
Speaking of which, smoking use overall is down significantly...in 1965 over half of all men and 1/3 of all women smoked; those numbers are now 1/4 and 1/5, respectively.  Adults account for all of this improvement, the teenagers continue to start at an alarming rate. (Here's an interesting factoid: if you haven't started by the time you are in your early 20's you almost certainly never will.  If you are over 30 and smoke there is a 90-95% chance that you wish you didn't. Too bad we trap and condemn ourselves before we have developed a useful brain....!)
 
Cancer death rates finally began decreasing in the 1990's.  Early screening makes a difference, but lifestyle changes contribute in large measure.  Thanks and good work, folks like the Clean Air Coalition (NIH, ACS, AHA, and others who care about human beings), and congrats wellness-oriented humans, the beneficiaries!  By the way, Cancer is still our #2 killer (and heart disease still holds 1st), and American Cancer Society estimates that over 75% of all cancer deaths are preventable, so too many pats on the back may be a bit premature...
 
Diets are better: fate intake averaged 40% total calories in the 60's, now its about 33%.
 
We're drinking less alcohol.  About time!  (Again, the young people, especially students, have become the greatest problem...)
 
Blood cholesterol levels are (finally!) dropping: in the 60's 1/3 of us were in the clearly "high" level (over 240, that number is now under 20%.
 
We are, however, fatter than ever (2/3 of all Americans overweight or obese), the vast majority still don't exercise enough (which would, as I've repeatedly emphasized, have a tremendous positive impact on virtually every other health problem), smoking continues to kill us at an alarming rate, and we have more stress-related illnesses than ever.
 
What's the message? Clearly, wellness efforts, on a corporate and individual level, work.  Just as clearly, we have a long way to go.  MY message?  Please let's at least head in the right direction!
 
Here's an idea for a step in that direction: God has blessed us with some gorgeous weather, bless yourself with a little physical activity out in it!
 

3-22-07

Tai Chi: "Try it, you just MAY like it"!

An ancient martial arts form highly regarded for centuries in the Eastern world, and gaining popularity in "leaps and bounds" (or, rather, slow flowing steps and arm movements) in the Western world, its regular adherents will tout its myriad physical and psychological benefits.  But are they real, or just a "mystic-in-your-mind" old tradition and new fad?  How does it compare to, say, more traditional exercises and health improvement regimens?

Well, these are strong words coming from a "show me the hard data, forget the 'touchy-feely nonsense' exercise physiologist":

But, in short, and in order, yes, and, quite well, thank you!

Until the last few years, at least for it's practice in America, the "documentation" of its "benefits" consisted of primarily anecdotal stories and testimonies by those peculiar folks who's almost comically slow, apparently random, movements on public green areas amused us "real fitness experts."

But suddenly research published in exercise physiology journals began to focus on this "alternative" exercise form.  NOW I'm interested.  And controlled studies were consistently documenting statistically significant improvements in such areas as strength, flexibility, balance (minor surprises) as well as blood pressure and even cholesterol (major surprises).  NOW I'm SOLD.  In fact, researchers in more than one credible study showed greater improvements in balance with Tai Chi than with specifically directed balance programs for older folks.

Stress levels and stress coping also tend to improve, as do certain measures of quali